Category: Referencing

Why You Shouldn’t Let AI Do Your Bibliography for You

WordPress User [sif4] Information Skills, Learning, Referencing

Look, I’ve been there. It’s 2am and you’ve got an assignment due later that day. Your references are looking a bit thin, and the temptation to ask an AI tool to whip up some citations for you can be irresistible. One prompt and you’ve got a neat list of journal articles and books. Perfect, right? Well… not always.

Here’s the catch (there’s always a catch!): AI tools are great at generating convincing-looking references. The titles sound plausible, author names are familiar, and the journals look legitimate. But sometimes appearances are deceptive, and the references have no connection to reality. This is what people mean when they talk about AI hallucinations. The tool invents a source that looks perfectly credible but doesn’t actually exist.

Why does this matter?

  • The most important reason is: that you shouldn’t put anything in your bibliography that you haven’t actually read. A bibliography isn’t just a list of things that might support your argument; it’s a record of the sources you’ve genuinely engaged with. If you haven’t read the book, article, or paper, you can’t know whether it really says what you think it says, or whether it fits your argument at all.
  • Putting a made-up citation into your work undermines the credibility of your whole assignment.
  • Your lecturers and tutors can (and often will) check your references. If they can’t find them, it’s a problem.
  • Good referencing isn’t just box-ticking, it’s how you show you’ve done the reading and can back up your ideas. It’s also about giving proper credit and joining the scholarly conversation.
  • Universities take referencing seriously: misusing or inventing sources can be flagged as poor or even unacceptable academic practice, with real consequences for your marks.

So what should you do?

  • Verify, verify, verify! If an AI gives you a reference, always double-check it against a reliable source – in the library catalogue, Google Scholar, or a subject database.
  • Ask your librarian. That’s what we’re here for. We can help you find legitimate, citable sources, show you how to search databases effectively, and help you guide you through proper referencing styles so you don’t have to wrestle with formatting at 2 a.m.

AI has lots of uses, but it’s not infallible, and it’s definitely not a replacement for critical thinking (or a decent library search).

So next time you’re tempted to drop those AI generated citations straight into your bibliography, stop, double-check, and if you need help, turn to your librarian, although if it’s 2 a.m., the library catalogue is probably your best bet!

For more information on AI can be found here.

Hwyl fawr Lloyd Roderick

WordPress User [abc27] Help & advice, Information Skills, Learning, Referencing, Research, Teaching

Congratulations and hwyl fawr to Lloyd Roderick who is taking up a new role at the National Library of Wales after ten years of sterling service in the Academic Engagement team.

Prior to joining us, Lloyd had achieved a PhD in Fine Art at Aberystwyth and gained wide-ranging experience in the sector, working at the Advanced Institute of Legal Studies, the Courtauld Library and Newport public libraries amongst others. As Subject Librarian for Art, History & Welsh History, Law & Criminology and Welsh & Celtic Studies, Lloyd has forged excellent relationships between the University Library and academic departments and will be much missed by all who have worked with him across the University. He has been an excellent team player, a prolific teacher of information skills and has brought strong subject knowledge to his responsibilities.

One legacy he leaves for the Academic Engagement team is the midday Friday “guess the library occupancy” quiz – no prizes, it’s just for fun!  We’ll keep it going in your honour Lloyd 🙂 

Good luck in your new job from all of us. We’re glad you’re not going far and look forward to seeing you again soon.

The usefulness of reference generators…and a word of caution

WordPress User [nrb] Help & advice, Information Skills, Referencing Leave a comment

Reference generators like MyBib and Scribbr have become popular tools for students navigating the complexities of academic writing. These tools simplify the process of formatting citations and bibliographies, which means you get to save some precious time! However, while they are good starting points to quickly generate a reference, you should approach them with responsibility and caution.

Strengths of MyBib and Scribbr

  1. Ease of Use: Both MyBib and Scribbr are user-friendly, offering intuitive interfaces that allow you to input resource details quickly and generate citations in referencing styles like APA, MLA, Harvard and many more.
  2. Key Features:
    • Creates references for a variety of resources, including books, e-books, journal articles, websites and more!
    • MyBib integrates seamlessly with platforms like Word, ensuring smooth workflows during document drafting.
    • Scribbr offers features like secure backups and annotations to enhance organisation and protect work.
  3. Free Accessibility: Both tools are free to use, making them accessible to students across various academic levels. You can use them without an account or sign up for a free account to unlock more features.

Limitations to Consider

While these tools are helpful, they are not perfect. You should be aware of the following limitations:

  1. Accuracy Issues:
    • Citation generators can occasionally misinterpret uncommon or complex sources, leading to formatting errors.
    • Automated tools may struggle with non-standard references such as datasets or foreign-language texts.
    • Common errors by these tools are capitalisation, punctuation, spacing, formatting and even incorrect information or placement.
  2. Over-Reliance Risks:
    • Blindly trusting these tools without verifying the output can result in incorrect citations that compromise good academic practice. Do not just copy and paste the reference from MyBib or Scribbr directly into your assignment without checking (and checking again!) for accuracy.
    • Errors in citations can lead to deductions in grades and/or even accusations of plagiarism.

Best Practices for Responsible Use

To use citation generators effectively while minimising risks, you should follow these guidelines:

  1. Verify Every Citation: Always double-check the generated references against official style guides and your departmental guidelines to ensure accuracy and that you don’t lose marks for your referencing.
    • Ensure you’re following your departmental referencing style – check your department and module handbook.
    • Check the generated reference against the examples given in the Referencing and Plagiarism Awareness LibGuide. Tab 8 of the LibGuide has departmental referencing examples – find your department and cross check the reference for the source used (e.g. book, e-book, article, website etc.) is written in the correct format and order.
    • Seek guidance from your Subject Librarian. They offer one-on-one consultations and are experts in the specific referencing styles used in your fields of study.
  2. Understand reference rules: Familiarise yourself with the principles of academic referencing to spot errors and make necessary corrections – these reference generator tools are handy, but they can’t replace the skill of and the importance of knowing how to reference correctly.
  3. Use as a Starting Point: Treat tools like MyBib and Scribbr as initial aids rather than definitive solutions. They simplify the process but do not replace critical thinking or attention to detail.
  4. Cross-Check Sources: For complex or uncommon sources, consult additional resources or seek guidance from your Subject Librarian.
  5. Avoid Over-Reliance: Make sure to find a good balance between automation of these tools and manual effort—it’s all about staying in control of your academic work and learning the skill of referencing for yourself.

Yes, MyBib and Scribbr are valuable tools for simplifying citation management for academic writing. Their ease of use and accessibility make them ideal starting points for working on assignments. However, a few words of caution. They are not flawless, foolproof nor entirely reliable – it is essential that you double check and verify what is generated for accuracy. These tools should not be used as a substitute for a comprehensive understanding of citation and referencing style rules. Responsible use of these tools ensures that good academic practice is upheld while benefiting from their convenience.